Sutton v. Bufford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sutton v. Bufford

142 S.E. 163, 165 Ga. 837, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 73

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 16, 1928

DocketNo. 6103

StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 163 (Sutton v. Bufford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton v. Bufford, 142 S.E. 163, 165 Ga. 837, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 73 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The assignment of error based on the amendment to the motion for new trial was expressly abandoned in the brief of the attorneys for the plaintiff in error, and will not be considered by this court,

2. No complaint was made of any error of law having been made by the court at the trial. The evidence, though conflicting in part, was sufficient to support the verdict finding for the plaintiff, and the judge did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

1. The assignment of error based on the amendment to the motion for new trial was expressly abandoned in the brief of the attorneys for the plaintiff in error, and will not be considered by this court,

2. No complaint was made of any error of law having been made by the court at the trial. The evidence, though conflicting in part, was sufficient to support the verdict finding for the plaintiff, and the judge did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 S.E. 163, 165 Ga. 837, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-v-bufford-ga-1928.