Sutton v. Bancroft
64 U.S. 320, 16 L. Ed. 454, 23 How. 320, 1859 U.S. LEXIS 774
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
*321 The plaintifls in error were sued on a promissory note executed by them. They did not pretend to have any defence. They entered a false plea, which was. overruled on demurrer. They refused to plead in bar. Judgment was entered against them in due form, for want of a plea.
They do not pretend to allege any error in the proceedings. The judgment is therefore affirmed, with fen per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sutton v. Bancroft, 64 U.S. 320, 16 L. Ed. 454, 23 How. 320, 1859 U.S. LEXIS 774 (1860).
64 U.S. 320 (Sutton v. Bancroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The United States v. William Bennitz
64 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1860)