SUTTON LAW FIRM v. JANET MADAFFER AND KENT GOLDY
This text of SUTTON LAW FIRM v. JANET MADAFFER AND KENT GOLDY (SUTTON LAW FIRM v. JANET MADAFFER AND KENT GOLDY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D23-947 Lower Tribunal No. 2017CA-004111-0000-00 _____________________________
DEBRA J. SUTTON, P.A., d/b/a SUTTON LAW FIRM,
Appellant, v.
JANET MADAFFER and KENT GOLDY,
Appellees. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County. James A. Yancey, Judge.
April 23, 2024
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
TRAVER, C.J., and WHITE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
Debra J. Sutton and Matthew J. Kovschak, of Sutton Law Firm, Bartow, for Appellant.
Nicole Deese Newlon, of Johnson, Newlon & DeCort, P.A., Tampa, and J. Derek Kantaskas, of Kantaskas Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee, Kent Goldy.
No Appearance for Appellee, Janet Madaffer.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SUTTON LAW FIRM v. JANET MADAFFER AND KENT GOLDY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-law-firm-v-janet-madaffer-and-kent-goldy-fladistctapp-2024.