Sutton Jr. Dean v. Brian Emig, Warden, J.T.V.C.C.
This text of Sutton Jr. Dean v. Brian Emig, Warden, J.T.V.C.C. (Sutton Jr. Dean v. Brian Emig, Warden, J.T.V.C.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DEAN SUTTON JR., § § No. 288, 2025 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. N25M-05-079 BRIAN EMIG, WARDEN, § J.T.V.C.C., § § Respondent Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: November 7, 2025 Decided: November 13, 2025
ORDER
On October 6, 2025, the Chief Deputy Clerk sent a notice of brief delinquency
to the appellant, Dean Sutton Jr., because he had not filed an opening brief by the
October 2, 2025 deadline set by the Court. On October 17, 2025, the Chief Deputy
Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail, to Sutton directing him to show cause
why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file an opening brief.
Sutton received the notice on October 27, 2025. A timely response to the notice was
due on or before November 6, 2025. To date, Sutton has neither responded to the
notice to show cause nor filed an opening brief. Dismissal of this appeal is therefore
deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal be DISMISSED
under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sutton Jr. Dean v. Brian Emig, Warden, J.T.V.C.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-jr-dean-v-brian-emig-warden-jtvcc-del-2025.