SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION v. City of Syracuse
889 N.E.2d 497, 10 N.Y.3d 858, 859 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1437
Opinion
SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SYRACUSE, Appellant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Judge CIPARICK taking no part.
Motions for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION v. City of Syracuse, 889 N.E.2d 497, 10 N.Y.3d 858, 859 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1437 (N.Y. 2008).
889 N.E.2d 497 (SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION v. City of Syracuse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In THE MATTER OF WARD v. Spitzer
10 N.Y.3d 858 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)