SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION v. City of Syracuse
889 N.E.2d 497, 10 N.Y.3d 858, 859 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1437
This text of 889 N.E.2d 497 (SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION v. City of Syracuse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION v. City of Syracuse, 889 N.E.2d 497, 10 N.Y.3d 858, 859 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1437 (N.Y. 2008).
Opinion
SUTTON INVESTING CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SYRACUSE, Appellant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Judge CIPARICK taking no part.
Motions for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In THE MATTER OF WARD v. Spitzer
10 N.Y.3d 858 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
889 N.E.2d 497, 10 N.Y.3d 858, 859 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-investing-corporation-v-city-of-syracuse-ny-2008.