Sutton Associates v. Finance Administration

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sutton Associates v. Finance Administration

70 A.D.2d 519, 416 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 519 (Sutton Associates v. Finance Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sutton Associates v. Finance Administration, 70 A.D.2d 519, 416 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 12, 1978, fixing real property tax assessments, is unanimously modified, on the law, without costs, to the extent that the judgment is vacated, the findings of valuation are affirmed, and the matter is remanded for a new trial on the issue of inequality only and appropriate judgment thereafter. The Corporation Counsel, representing the tax authorities, concedes that the petition was sufficient to raise the issue of inequality and that a remand to the trial court on this issue is required. (See Guth Realty v Gingold, 34 NY2d 440; Matter of Rokowsky v Finance Administrator of City of N. Y., 41 NY2d 574; Real Property Tax Law, art 7; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 166-1.0, subd b, par 3.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lane, Lupiano, Silverman and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 12, 1978, fixing real property tax assessments, is unanimously modified, on the law, without costs, to the extent that the judgment is vacated, the findings of valuation are affirmed, and the matter is remanded for a new trial on the issue of inequality only and appropriate judgment thereafter. The Corporation Counsel, representing the tax authorities, concedes that the petition was sufficient to raise the issue of inequality and that a remand to the trial court on this issue is required. (See Guth Realty v Gingold, 34 NY2d 440; Matter of Rokowsky v Finance Administrator of City of N. Y., 41 NY2d 574; Real Property Tax Law, art 7; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 166-1.0, subd b, par 3.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lane, Lupiano, Silverman and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 519, 416 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutton-associates-v-finance-administration-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack