Sutton Area Community v. Board of Estimate

578 N.E.2d 436, 78 N.Y.2d 945, 573 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 1016
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 9, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[947] OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

The record, viewed as a whole, reveals that the Board was fully informed of all pertinent environmental issues, including those dealing with the sewage treatment plant change, and considered these numerous factors before approving the project. Accordingly, the "hard look” standard of judicial review is satisfied and the determination must be confirmed (see, Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton Area Community v. Board of Estimate, 578 N.E.2d 436, 78 N.Y.2d 945, 573 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 1016 (N.Y. 1991).

578 N.E.2d 436 (Sutton Area Community v. Board of Estimate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coalition for Responsible Development in Goldens Bridge v. Town Planning Board of the Town of Lewisboro
221 A.D.2d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Kelsky v. Town of Lewisboro Planning Board
215 A.D.2d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)