Suttles v. Southeastern Health Facilities.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedFebruary 14, 2002
DocketI.C. NO. 902686
StatusPublished

This text of Suttles v. Southeastern Health Facilities. (Suttles v. Southeastern Health Facilities.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suttles v. Southeastern Health Facilities., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence reverses the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award.
***********
The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner and in a Pre-Trial Agreement dated August 25, 2000 as:

STIPULATIONS
1. Plaintiff is Ruth Patricia Suttles.

2. Defendant is Southeastern Health Facilities, d/b/a Mountain View Manor.

3. At all times relevant hereto, the employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant.

4. At all times relevant hereto, the parties were and are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

5. Defendant is self-insured and Key Risk Management Services is the servicing agent with respect to the injury by accident of 28 November 1998.

6. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $326.62, which yields a compensation rate of $217.75.

***********
Based upon the competent, credible evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was born on 25 April 1950. She has a G.E.D. and certification as a nursing assistant (CNA). Plaintiff had previously worked for defendant Mountain View Manor about a year before, but had not worked anywhere for the six to twelve month period before she was rehired by defendant as a CNA in November 1998.

2. Plaintiff testified that after working for defendant for eight days in November 1998, she sustained an injury by accident and by a specific traumatic incident on 28 November 1998. At this time, she was working 12-hour shifts from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. Plaintiff testified that on 28 November 1998, she was attempting to reposition a patient in the bed when she felt a sharp pain in her right lower back. Plaintiff also testified that later during that same shift, she injured her right ankle while emptying a linen buggy. The buggy struck her right ankle.

3. Plaintiff did not report any injuries to the charge nurse before she left work on 28 November 1998. The next day, plaintiff called in and advised Christy Cable, her supervising nurse, that she would not be in to work because her back was hurting. Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 is a letter that plaintiff wrote, apparently on 1 December 1998, explaining the circumstances of her accident. The letter says in pertinent part that "I pulled something in the lower part of my back when trying to lift Matrian Gregg over in her bed. . . . Also my right ankle I hit on the soiled linen barrel when emptying it at the end of shift. It is swollen up and hurting bad. I saw Dr. Crider Monday. He said he would be happy to speak with you if need be." Plaintiff requested her daughter to hand-deliver this note to defendant on or about that same date.

4. Plaintiff had pre-existing problems with her right ankle. In 1985, plaintiff sustained a fracture to her right ankle, which was repaired with pins and screws. Subsequent to that time, she developed arthritis in her right ankle. As noted in her medical records, this ankle injury had caused plaintiff problems before when she worked and stayed on her feet for prolonged periods of time. She had been seen at Harris Regional Hospital on 23 May 1996, with complaints that working 12-hour shifts and being on her feet for 3 to 4 hours at a time was causing pain in her right ankle and her right knee.

5. Plaintiff first sought medical treatment for her back and right ankle injuries of 28 November 1998 with Dr. Steven S. Crider, a general practitioner in Sylva, on 30 November 1998. Dr. Crider's notes of the visit indicate that plaintiff complained of a week-long history of intermittent right ankle pain with swelling and right lower back pain, which had gotten intense and made it difficult for her to do her job. Dr. Crider testified that he recalled plaintiff talking about a cart she was pushing going up against her ankle. Further, when shown plaintiff's Exhibit 1 and the description therein of plaintiff's injuries by accident, Dr. Crider testified that it was consistent with his recall of his discussion with plaintiff when she presented to him on 30 November 1998.

6. Dr. Crider noted a subcutaneous bursa which was fluid filled and an old scar on the right ankle. He assessed plaintiff with right ankle arthralgia secondary to fracture/post-traumatic arthritis and right paraspinal muscle spasms/lower back pain. Dr. Crider recommended that plaintiff rest but not in bed, and took plaintiff out of work from 28 November 1998 through 9 December 1998. He also referred her to Dr. James H. Lipsey, an orthopedic surgeon.

7. Plaintiff presented to Dr. Lipsey on 9 December 1998. On the health information form she filled out upon arrival, plaintiff describes both incidents at work in which she was injured and gives the date of injury as 11-28-98. On examination of her ankle, Dr. Lipsey found some minimal puffiness, which plaintiff indicated was there prior to her injury. Dr. Lipsey also noted a full range of motion of the ankle, with no indication of an acute injury. He assessed a contusion to the right ankle and a lumbrosacral sprain. Dr. Lipsey placed her on partial bed rest and told her to avoid doing housework.

8. Plaintiff next reported to Dr. Lipsey on 15 December 1998, complaining of soreness in her back without radiation into her legs. Dr. Lipsey noted minor tenderness in her lower back and ordered x-rays of her lumbar spine, which showed no bone or joint abnormality. He took plaintiff out of work until 15 January 1998.

9. On 27 January 1999, plaintiff returned to Dr. Lipsey, reporting only occasional soreness in her back. Dr. Lipsey noted that her back showed no local tenderness, and found that she had a range of motion consistent with her age and habitus. Dr. Lipsey found that she had completely recovered from her lumbrosacral sprain, with no permanent impairment, and assigned a zero percent permanent partial disability. He released her from his care with no work restrictions, although he did caution her on lifting.

10. After learning about Dr. Lipsey's full duty release, Kathy Simonds, a nursing director for Mountain View Manor, offered plaintiff employment in her former position. Ms. Simonds placed plaintiff on the work schedule shortly thereafter and called her to confirm her attendance. Plaintiff replied that she would report for work; however, she did not show up for work. Instead, she never returned to work for Mountain View Manor. Ms. Simonds kept plaintiff on the schedule for three more days before removing her due to her continued failure to report for work.

11. Thereafter, plaintiff did not seek medical treatment for her back for nearly nine months. She cancelled appointments or did not show up for at least three appointments with Dr. Lipsey in March and April 1999.

12. On 23 September 1999, Dr. Crider refilled a prescription of Ultram. This was the first medication he had prescribed for plaintiff since 4 December 1998. On 29 September 1999, plaintiff saw Dr. Crider for complaints of back pain that she related to her work injury. However, on this occasion she complained of pain in the left lower back and left leg, whereas her prior complaints related to the right lower back.

13. Plaintiff was then examined by Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.
282 S.E.2d 828 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.
290 S.E.2d 682 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Suttles v. Southeastern Health Facilities., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suttles-v-southeastern-health-facilities-ncworkcompcom-2002.