Sutter v. Nelson
This text of 126 A.D.2d 634 (Sutter v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Fertig, J.), dated April 22, 1985, which is in favor of the defendants and against him, based upon the plaintiff’s failure to establish a prima facie case of damages.
Ordered, that the judgment is reversed, with costs, and a new trial is granted on the issue of damages.
In light of the established merit of the liability phase of the [635]*635plaintiffs claim, the diligence exercised by the plaintiff’s counsel, the short delay requested, and the importance of the testimony in issue, the continuance requested should have been granted (see, Gombas v Roberts, 104 AD2d 521; Wilson v Wilson, 97 AD2d 897; Balogh v H.R.B. Caterers, 88 AD2d 136). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D.2d 634, 511 N.Y.S.2d 71, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutter-v-nelson-nyappdiv-1987.