Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.

683 N.E.2d 789, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1486
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1997
Docket97-1142
StatusPublished

This text of 683 N.E.2d 789 (Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co., 683 N.E.2d 789, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Certified State Law Question, No. 1:97CV1283. On preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6). The court will.answer the following question found at page 10 of the Certification Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, filed June 5, 1997:

“Whether market share exists in Ohio as a viable theory of liability in a DES products liability action.”

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.

[1487]*1487On motion for admission pro hac vice of Sheila AnnMarie Moeller and on motion for admission pro hoc.vice of A. Edward Grashof. Motions granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 N.E.2d 789, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutowski-v-eli-lilly-co-ohio-1997.