Sutkowski v. Mayor of Jackson
This text of 445 A.2d 409 (Sutkowski v. Mayor of Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Havey in his opinion of February 11, 1981. 184 N.J.Super. 198. Our review of the extensive legislative history preceding adoption of N.J.S.A. 40A:9-12, L.1971, c. 200, as amended by L.1979', e. 83, and N.J.S.A. 40A:9-12.1, L.1979, e. 302, persuades us the judge correctly concluded that the Legislature “intended to continue the general mandate that the filling of vacancies, unless specifically provided otherwise by statute, would be for the unexpired term.” See 63 Am.<7ur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, § 155 at 723-724. Furthermore, plaintiff’s failure to complete her Civil Defense course within one year of her appointment, as mandated by statute, disqualified her from continuing in office. NJ.S.A.App. A:9-40.1.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
445 A.2d 409, 184 N.J. Super. 97, 1982 N.J. Super. LEXIS 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutkowski-v-mayor-of-jackson-njsuperctappdiv-1982.