Sutka v. Sutka

22 A.D.3d 568, 801 N.Y.S.2d 746

This text of 22 A.D.3d 568 (Sutka v. Sutka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutka v. Sutka, 22 A.D.3d 568, 801 N.Y.S.2d 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

[569]*569In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 10, 1999, as amended by judgment dated October 15, 2001, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated December 23, 2003, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found him in contempt for willfully violating a provision of the amended judgment dated October 15, 2001, which directed him to pay stated percentages of unreimbursed medical costs, private school tuition, and child care expenses for the parties’ children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention on appeal, the defendant demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the plaintiff willfully violated a clear and unequivocal provision of an amended judgment dated October 15, 2001, which directed him to pay stated percentages of unreimbursed medical costs, private school tuition, and child care expenses for the parties’ children (see Corrado v Corrado, 18 AD3d 599 [2005]; Domestic Relations Law § 245).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or lack merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corrado v. Corrado
18 A.D.3d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 A.D.3d 568, 801 N.Y.S.2d 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutka-v-sutka-nyappdiv-2005.