Sutherland v. . the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.
26 N.E. 609, 125 N.Y. 737, 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1571
Opinion
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 739
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 740 Per Curiam opinion for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sutherland v. . the Troy and Boston R.R. Co., 26 N.E. 609, 125 N.Y. 737, 1891 N.Y. LEXIS 1571 (N.Y. 1891).
26 N.E. 609 (Sutherland v. . the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zebrowski v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.
83 A. 957 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1912)
Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Hamerick
96 N.E. 649 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Gossett
87 N.E. 723 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
Strottman v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
109 S.W. 769 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1908)
Illinois Cent. R. v. Bentz
99 F. 657 (Sixth Circuit, 1900)
Oregon Short Line & U. N. Ry. Co. v. Frost
74 F. 965 (Ninth Circuit, 1896)
Baltimore & O. R. v. Camp
65 F. 952 (Sixth Circuit, 1895)
Hankins v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.
37 N.E. 466 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Hankins v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
142 N.Y. 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Sutherland v. Troy & Boston Railroad
26 N.Y.S. 237 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)