Sutherland v. McInnes

14 F.2d 307, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2043
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 7, 1926
DocketNo. 7218
StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.2d 307 (Sutherland v. McInnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sutherland v. McInnes, 14 F.2d 307, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2043 (8th Cir. 1926).

Opinion

WOODROUGH, District Judge.

The considerations which compel an affirmance in the ease of Nicholas Brill v. McInnes, Receiver (No. 7217) 14 F.(2d) 306, result in an affirmance in this ease; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brill v. McInnes
14 F.2d 306 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F.2d 307, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutherland-v-mcinnes-ca8-1926.