Sutherland v. City of New York
95 N.Y.2d 790
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal with respect to defendants Pile Foundation Construction Co., Inc., the City of New York, the Department of Sanitation of the City of New York, and the Department of Business Services of the City of New York, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portion of the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine an action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sutherland v. City of New York, 95 N.Y.2d 790 (N.Y. 2000).
95 N.Y.2d 790 (Sutherland v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beltran v. Waterfront Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.
2022 NY Slip Op 00564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of J-Bon, LLC v. City of Syracuse
2020 NY Slip Op 07813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Doviak v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
63 A.D.3d 1348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Krollman v. Food Automation Service Techniques, Inc.
13 A.D.3d 1209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Maine-Endwell Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of Education
3 A.D.3d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Bogoni v. Simpson
306 A.D.2d 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Meis v. ELO Organization, L. L. C.
282 A.D.2d 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)