Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co.
7 F.R.D. 358, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 F.R.D. 422 →
Opinion
Carl G. Drayman has moved the Court to dismiss the complaint as to him. It appears from the amended complaint that the petitioner was the inventor of the patent in suit who had assigned it to the Grant Paper Box Company but had reserved the right to approve all licenses granted by the assignor, with certain other reservations.
Whether Mr. Drayman was a necessary party is questionable, but undoubtedly his interest is such that he is a desirable party.
His motion will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co., 7 F.R.D. 358, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1678 (W.D. Pa. 1947).
7 F.R.D. 358 (Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.