Sutfin, Sanford Alden v. State
This text of Sutfin, Sanford Alden v. State (Sutfin, Sanford Alden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion filed May 22, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00468-CR
SANFORD ALDEN SUTFIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 180th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 669,751
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a guilty plea, appellant was convicted of the offense of indecency with a child and sentenced to ten years in prison on August 13, 1993. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed until March 31, 2003.
A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 22, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Hudson and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sutfin, Sanford Alden v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sutfin-sanford-alden-v-state-texapp-2003.