Suter v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Suter v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.

194 A.D.2d 466, 599 N.Y.S.2d 260

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered June 5, 1992, which denied defendant W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs personal affidavit along with other evidence indicates that her late husband was likely exposed to asbestos-containing material which was manufactured by W.R. Grace. Accordingly, questions of fact are raised as to whether said exposure resulted in the death of plaintiffs husband allegedly caused by asbestos-related lung cancer. Summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered June 5, 1992, which denied defendant W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs personal affidavit along with other evidence indicates that her late husband was likely exposed to asbestos-containing material which was manufactured by W.R. Grace. Accordingly, questions of fact are raised as to whether said exposure resulted in the death of plaintiffs husband allegedly caused by asbestos-related lung cancer. Summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Suter v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., 194 A.D.2d 466, 599 N.Y.S.2d 260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

194 A.D.2d 466 (Suter v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related