Suter v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.

194 A.D.2d 466, 599 N.Y.S.2d 260
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 A.D.2d 466 (Suter v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suter v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., 194 A.D.2d 466, 599 N.Y.S.2d 260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered June 5, 1992, which denied defendant W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs personal affidavit along with other evidence indicates that her late husband was likely exposed to asbestos-containing material which was manufactured by W.R. Grace. Accordingly, questions of fact are raised as to whether said exposure resulted in the death of plaintiffs husband allegedly caused by asbestos-related lung cancer. Summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 A.D.2d 466, 599 N.Y.S.2d 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suter-v-wr-grace-co-conn-nyappdiv-1993.