Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of Maryland, Inc.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her motion to reconsider under Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v. McDonald’s Rest. of Md., Inc., Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2014 & Jan. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
607 F. App'x 339 (Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of Maryland, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.