Sutch v. Rox. Mem. Hosp., of: Geller
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ROSALIND W. SUTCH, AS EXECUTRIX : No. 63 EAL 2017 OF THE ESTATE OF ROSALIND : WILSON, DECEASED :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
ROXBOROUGH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, : SOLIS HEALTHCARE, LP, ANDORRA : RADIOLOGY ASSOC., TENET : HEALTHSYSTEM ROXBOROUGH, LLC, : TENET, INC., TENET GROUP, LLC, : ROXBOROUGH EMERGENCY : PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, : BARBARA ROBINS, M.D., JEFFREY : GELLER, M.D., AND MELANIO D. : AGUIRRE :
: :
PETITION OF: NANCY K. RAYNOR, : RAYNOR & ASSOCIATES, P.C., : JEFFREY GELLER, M.D., AND : ROXBOROUGH EMERGENCY : PHYSICAN ASSOCIATES, LLC :
ROSALIND W. SUTCH, AS EXECUTRIX : No. 64 EAL 2017 OF THE ESTATE OF ROSALIND : WILSON, DECEASED :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
ROXBOROUGH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, : SOLIS HEALTHCARE, LP, ANDORRA : RADIOLOGY ASSOC., TENET : HEALTHSYSTEM ROXBOROUGH, LLC, : TENET, INC., TENET GROUP, LLC, : ROXBOROUGH EMERGENCY : PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES, LLC, : BARBARA ROBINS, M.D., JEFFREY :
GELLER, M.D., AND MELANIO D. : AGUIRRE, M.D. :
: :
PETITION OF: JEFFREY GELLER, M.D. : AND ROXBOROUGH EMERGENCY : PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
The Petitioners’ application for leave to file a reply in support of the Petitioner for
Allowance of Appeal and Respondent’s application for leave to file a response to
Petitioners’ request for leave to file a reply brief are hereby DENIED.
Justice Todd did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
[63 EAL 2017 and 64 EAL 2017] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sutch v. Rox. Mem. Hosp., of: Geller (Sutch v. Rox. Mem. Hosp., of: Geller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.