Susswein v. Frankel

234 A.D. 873

This text of 234 A.D. 873 (Susswein v. Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Susswein v. Frankel, 234 A.D. 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order granting motion for injunction pendente lite affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Tompkins, J., dissent and vote to modify the order by striking out that part thereof which restrains defendant Elias from acting. [141 Mise. 832.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susswein-v-frankel-nyappdiv-1931.