Sussman v. Sussman
This text of 178 N.W.2d 244 (Sussman v. Sussman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a complaint without prejudice. The order is not appealable. Fischer v. Perisian, 251 Minn. 166, 86 N. W. (2d) 737. We have examined the record and find no basis for according discretionary review. A judgment of the district court was entered December 9, 1963, resolving the claims underlying the dismissed complaint. This judgment is not subject to collateral attack. Campbell v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc. 273 Minn. 525, 142 *554 N. W. (2d) 255. While such a judgment can be attacked directly, 1 plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that her right to this relief, if any, has been prejudiced by the order of dismissal.
Appeal dismissed.
Minn. St. 548.14. See, also, In re Trusteeship under Will of Melgaard, 200 Minn. 493, 274 N. W. 641.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 N.W.2d 244, 287 Minn. 553, 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sussman-v-sussman-minn-1970.