Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sussman v. Rosenblum

Sussman v. Rosenblum

58 N.Y.S. 1150
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.Y.S. 1150 (Sussman v. Rosenblum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sussman v. Rosenblum, 58 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The present rule is that pleadings should be construed with reasonable liberality. So construed, we are of opinion that the counterclaim intended to charge an assault arising out oí the same affray for which the defendant is sued by the plaintiff. The interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent to abide the final event of the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.Y.S. 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sussman-v-rosenblum-nyappdiv-1899.