Sussman v. Harris
This text of Sussman v. Harris (Sussman v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-461-SPC-KCD
SHEVAUN HARRIS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, WELLPATH and RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff David Charles Sussman’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 20) and Notice of Inquiry (Doc. 21). On August 21, 2023, the Court dismissed Sussman’s initial complaint, entered judgment, and closed this case. (Docs. 17 and 19). A plaintiff seeking leave to amend after entry of judgment must first seek and obtain relief from the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b)(6). Friedman v. Market Street Mortg. Corp., 520 F.3d 1289, 1293 n.4 (11th Cir. 2008). Sussman has not done so. Accordingly, Sussman’s Amended Complaint is not ripe for consideration. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on September 7, 20238.
, Lh platrathe 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SA: FTMP-1 Copies: All Parties of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sussman v. Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sussman-v-harris-flmd-2023.