Sussman v. Cooper

537 F.2d 531, 190 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 418, 1976 CCPA LEXIS 146
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedJuly 15, 1976
DocketPatent Appeal No. 76-543
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 F.2d 531 (Sussman v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sussman v. Cooper, 537 F.2d 531, 190 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 418, 1976 CCPA LEXIS 146 (ccpa 1976).

Opinion

MILLER, Judge.

Senior party, Sussman,1 appeals from the decision2 of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of the two counts to junior party, Cooper.3 We reverse.

The Invention

The invention comprises a display device (as shown in Fig. 1 of the Cooper patent) which illuminates an article 24 containing a design 25 positioned between the observer 26 and a light source 10.

[532]*532 pkHMqUuyKVWzWBoJidgeG0nACeM2e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Bode
550 F.2d 656 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 F.2d 531, 190 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 418, 1976 CCPA LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sussman-v-cooper-ccpa-1976.