Sussex Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ruiz

508 So. 2d 424, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1222, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 1987·No. No. 86-489·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FERGUSON, Judge.

Plaintiffs/appellants brought this action to recover for damages caused, allegedly, by an act of arson. This appeal, after a judgment for the defendant/appellee, is grounded on an interlocutory order which denied plaintiff’s motion to compel production of the defendant’s sealed criminal records.1

Criminal history records which have been expunged or sealed are not discoverable for the purpose of a civil action against the defendant arising out of the same facts giving rise to the criminal prosecution. Such records which have been sealed pursuant to statute are “available only to the subject, his attorney, or to [425]*425criminal justice agencies for their respective criminal justice purposes.” § 943.-058(3), Fla.Stat. (1983). Even though the records have been sealed or expunged, the events they concern continue to have existence and may be discovered by other means. See City of West Palm Beach v. Meredith, 473 So.2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Walton v. Turlington, 444 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

The order of the trial court which denies plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of the defendant’s sealed criminal record is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sussex Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ruiz, 508 So. 2d 424, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1222, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8215 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

508 So. 2d 424 (Sussex Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Resha v. Tucker
600 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Griss v. Cardonne
546 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)