Susman v. Board of Education of the School District
245 U.S. 636, 38 S. Ct. 190, 62 L. Ed. 524, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1644
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112; Soliah v. Heskin, 222 U. S. 522; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Susman v. Board of Education of the School District, 245 U.S. 636, 38 S. Ct. 190, 62 L. Ed. 524, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1644 (1918).
245 U.S. 636 (Susman v. Board of Education of the School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Witherspoon v. Duncan
71 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1867)
Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley
164 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Soliah v. Heskin
222 U.S. 522 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis
233 U.S. 652 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)