Susle Mae Williams v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation
204 F.2d 404, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444
Opinion
In this suit for personal injuries the District Court directed a verdict for the defendant. In our opinion the appellant was not entitled to go to the jury on the theory of res ipsa loquitur and the court did not err in finding no substantial evidence of negligence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Susle Mae Williams v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation, 204 F.2d 404, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444 (D.C. Cir. 1953).
204 F.2d 404 (Susle Mae Williams v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pomeroy v. Pennsylvania R.
117 F. Supp. 893 (District of Columbia, 1954)
Elijah Claybrook v. United States
202 F.2d 366 (D.C. Circuit, 1953)