Susle Mae Williams v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation
204 F.2d 404, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 1953
Docket11343
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 204 F.2d 404 (Susle Mae Williams v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Susle Mae Williams v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation, 204 F.2d 404, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444 (D.C. Cir. 1953).
Opinion
In this suit for personal injuries the District Court directed a verdict for the defendant. In our opinion the appellant was not entitled to go to the jury on the theory of res ipsa loquitur and the court did not err in finding no substantial evidence of negligence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pomeroy v. Pennsylvania R.
117 F. Supp. 893 (District of Columbia, 1954)
Elijah Claybrook v. United States
202 F.2d 366 (D.C. Circuit, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
204 F.2d 404, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susle-mae-williams-v-capital-transit-company-a-corporation-cadc-1953.