Susko v. City of Weirton
This text of 443 F. App'x 805 (Susko v. City of Weirton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Rosemary Susko appeals the district court’s judgment granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on her 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Susko v. City of Weirton, No. 5:09-cv-00001-FPS-JES, 2011 WL 221825 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
443 F. App'x 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susko-v-city-of-weirton-ca4-2011.