Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Suskey v. Suskey

Suskey v. Suskey

679 So. 2d 887, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9906, 1996 WL 536975
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 24, 1996
DocketNo. 96-664
StatusPublished

This text of 679 So. 2d 887 (Suskey v. Suskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suskey v. Suskey, 679 So. 2d 887, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9906, 1996 WL 536975 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former husband challenges an award of attorney’s fees to the former wife. We find that the trial court failed to make sufficient findings concerning how it arrived at the amount of fees awarded, or how it determined entitlement to fees. Further, it is not readily apparent from the record on what the court bases its determinations.

We, therefore, reverse and remand for entry of an appropriate order. See Davis v. Davis, 613 So.2d 147, 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Hoffay v. Hoffay, 555 So.2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Davis
613 So. 2d 147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hoffay v. Hoffay
555 So. 2d 1309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 So. 2d 887, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9906, 1996 WL 536975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suskey-v-suskey-fladistctapp-1996.