Susie v. Watwood v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General of the United States
This text of 193 F.2d 40 (Susie v. Watwood v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
193 F.2d 40
90 U.S.App.D.C. 419
Susie V. WATWOOD, Appellant,
v.
J. Howard McGRATH, Attorney General of the United States, et
al., Appellees.
No. 10719.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 23,1951.
Decided Nov. 15, 1951.
Donald H. Dalton, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, and L. Clark Ewing, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellees. Charles M. Irelan, appointed U.S. Atty. subsequent to the argument in this case, and Joseph F. Goetten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the record. The judgment of the District Court is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 F.2d 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susie-v-watwood-v-j-howard-mcgrath-attorney-genera-cadc-1951.