Susie Grissom v. Carolyn W. Colvin
This text of 667 F. App'x 167 (Susie Grissom v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Susie Grissom, on behalf of her minor granddaughter ZNE, appeals the order of the district court 1 affirming the Commissioner’s determination that ZNE is not entitled to child’s disability benefits because her impairments do not meet, medically equal, or functionally equal, any listing. Upon careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart. 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir. 2005), we are satisfied that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and that Grissom’s arguments provide no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is'affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susie-grissom-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2016.