Susie Grissom v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Opinion
Susie Grissom, on behalf of her minor granddaughter ZNE, appeals the order of the district court 1 affirming the Commissioner’s determination that ZNE is not entitled to child’s disability benefits because her impairments do not meet, medically equal, or functionally equal, any listing. Upon careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart. 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir. 2005), we are satisfied that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and that Grissom’s arguments provide no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is'affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
667 F. App'x 167 (Susie Grissom v. Carolyn W. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.