Susie Grissom v. Carolyn W. Colvin

667 F. App'x 167
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 2016
Docket15-3293
StatusUnpublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 167 (Susie Grissom v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Susie Grissom v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 667 F. App'x 167 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Susie Grissom, on behalf of her minor granddaughter ZNE, appeals the order of the district court 1 affirming the Commissioner’s determination that ZNE is not entitled to child’s disability benefits because her impairments do not meet, medically equal, or functionally equal, any listing. Upon careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart. 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir. 2005), we are satisfied that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and that Grissom’s arguments provide no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is'affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susie-grissom-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2016.