Susi Contracting Co. v. Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank

264 A.D. 889, 36 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5263

Opinion

Defendant appeals from an order (so-called), made on reargument of a resettled order, adhering to the determination of the resettled order, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motion for like relief, in an action in replevin. Order on reargument affirmed, [890]*890with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from original resettled order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, j J.,_eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Susi Contracting Co. v. Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank, 264 A.D. 889, 36 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

264 A.D. 889 (Susi Contracting Co. v. Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.