Susi Contracting Co. v. Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank
This text of 264 A.D. 889 (Susi Contracting Co. v. Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from an order (so-called), made on reargument of a resettled order, adhering to the determination of the resettled order, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motion for like relief, in an action in replevin. Order on reargument affirmed, [890]*890with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from original resettled order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, j J.,_eoneur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 889, 36 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susi-contracting-co-v-lawrence-cedarhurst-bank-nyappdiv-1942.