Susanne Hurd v. James Hurd
This text of Susanne Hurd v. James Hurd (Susanne Hurd v. James Hurd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________
No. 07-21-00284-CV ________________________
SUSANNE HURD, APPELLANT
V.
JAMES HURD, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law Number 2 Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 71,814-L2; Honorable Matthew C. Martindale, Presiding
December 21, 2021
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Susanne Hurd, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal in the
referenced cause without identifying the judgment or order from which she seeks to
appeal. The trial court clerk has confirmed that no judgment has been issued and the
case remains pending. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Our appellate jurisdiction is limited to appeals from final judgments and
interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39
S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998) (per
curiam). By letter of December 1, 2021, we notified Hurd that it did not appear a final
judgment or appealable order had been issued by the trial court and directed her to show
how we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Although Hurd filed a response, she has not
demonstrated grounds for continuing the appeal.
Because Hurd has not presented this court with a final judgment or appealable
order, her appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Susanne Hurd v. James Hurd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susanne-hurd-v-james-hurd-texapp-2021.