Susan Whiteman v. Cingular Wireless LLC

273 F. App'x 841
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 14, 2008
Docket07-12607
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 273 F. App'x 841 (Susan Whiteman v. Cingular Wireless LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Susan Whiteman v. Cingular Wireless LLC, 273 F. App'x 841 (11th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Susan Whiteman appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Cingular Wireless on Whiteman’s pregnancy discrimination claims under the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”) and Title VII. On appeal, Whiteman argues that (1) pregnancy is a protected characteristic under the FCRA; (2) the district court improperly chose to apply the framework for establishing a prima facie case in reduction in force cases under Title VII; (3) she established a prima facie case of pregnancy discrimination under Title VII; and (4) a genuine issue of material fact exists concerning whether Cingular’s legitimate non-discriminatory reason for terminating Whiteman’s employment was in fact a pretext for discrimination.

We find that the district court properly applied the law to the facts of this case, and we affirm the district court’s entry of summary judgment in Cingular’s favor.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Delva v. Continental Group, Inc.
96 So. 3d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Berrios v. University of Miami
920 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
DuChateau v. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.
822 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (S.D. Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 F. App'x 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susan-whiteman-v-cingular-wireless-llc-ca11-2008.