Susan Rebecca Cammack v. Sheriff Russell Hierholzer

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 1, 2017
Docket04-17-00271-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Susan Rebecca Cammack v. Sheriff Russell Hierholzer (Susan Rebecca Cammack v. Sheriff Russell Hierholzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Susan Rebecca Cammack v. Sheriff Russell Hierholzer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 1, 2017

No. 04-17-00271-CV

Susan Rebecca CAMMACK, Appellant

v.

Sheriff Russell HIERHOLZER, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. 11228B Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Susan Rebecca Cammack has filed an emergency motion requesting that we order the sheriff of Kerr County to stay the sale of her real property. The motion identifies a trial court cause in which an agreed judgment was rendered in May 2012, and another judgment was rendered in September 2016. Although the motion refers to a summary judgment the trial court rendered, this court has no record of an appeal from either of these two judgments. The motion also does not specify any other trial court ruling about which Cammack complains.

This court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A timely notice of appeal also must be filed to invoke this court’s appellate jurisdiction. Sweed v. Nye, 323 S.W.3d 873, 875 (Tex. 2010) (per curiam). Furthermore, this court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over sheriffs unless it is shown that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a). The motion makes no such allegation or showing. We therefore order Susan Rebecca Cammack to file a response, by 8:00 a.m., May 2, 2017, showing why this proceeding should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED on this 1st day of May, 2017. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sweed v. Nye
323 S.W.3d 873 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Susan Rebecca Cammack v. Sheriff Russell Hierholzer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susan-rebecca-cammack-v-sheriff-russell-hierholzer-texapp-2017.