Susan Reams v. Boulder City, et al.

Opinion

SUSAN REAMS, Case No.: 2:25-cv-01315-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 27] BOULDER CITY, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On October 17, 2025, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Susan Reams has not complied with his orders to pay the 10}| filing fee or properly complete an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 27. For the reasons, he recommended that all pending motions be denied as moot. /d. at 3. Reams did object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 13}recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 15}}made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 17} objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 18 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation (ECF No. 27) is accepted, plaintiff Susan Reams’ complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without prejudice, and all pending motions (ECF Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 15) are denied without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 22 DATED this 5th day of November, 2025. 23 Ga ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE