Susan Mickels v. Smart
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 24, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161359 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh
SUSAN MICKELS, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 161359 COA: 344977 Wayne CC: 16-013725-NI
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, a/k/a SMART, Defendant-Appellant,
and D. MACRO CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and CB ASPHALT MAINTENANCE, LLC, Defendant,
and POCO, INC., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.
______________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
ZAHRA, J., would grant leave to appeal.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
March 24, 2021
a0317
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Susan Mickels v. Smart (Susan Mickels v. Smart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.