Susan Megawati v. Loretta E. Lynch

633 F. App'x 492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 2016
Docket14-70774
StatusUnpublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 492 (Susan Megawati v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Susan Megawati v. Loretta E. Lynch, 633 F. App'x 492 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Susan Megawati, , a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of *493 discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.2010), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Megawati’s motion to reopen, where she filed it more than two years after the final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and she failed to establish materially changed circumstances in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitations for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(h); see also Najmabadi 597 F.3d at 988-89 (evidence of changed circumstances must be qualitatively different from what could have been presented at prior hearing).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Najmabadi v. Holder
597 F.3d 983 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susan-megawati-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.