Susan M. Coffed v. John N. McCarthy
This text of Susan M. Coffed v. John N. McCarthy (Susan M. Coffed v. John N. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 44 Susan M. Coffed, as Administrator of the Estate of James B. Coffed, Deceased, Appellant, v. John N. McCarthy et al., Respondents.
Angelo S. Gambino, for appellant. Nicole B. Palmerton, for respondents.
MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion for summary judgment denied. The record discloses triable issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment.
- 1 - - 2 - No. 44
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion for summary judgment denied, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Fahey took no part.
Decided May 2, 2017
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Susan M. Coffed v. John N. McCarthy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susan-m-coffed-v-john-n-mccarthy-ny-2017.