Susan Fringer v. Kersey Homes, Inc.

Opinion

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Sam Glasscock III CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 AND LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19980-3734

DATE SUBMITTED: July 2, 2018 DATE DECIDED: July 3, 2018

Dean Campbell, Esquire Richard E. Berl, Jr., Esquire Law Office of Dean A. Campbell LLC Hudson Jones Jaywork & Fisher LLC 20175 Office Circle 34382 Carpenter’s Way, Suite 3 Georgetown, DE 19947 Lewes, DE 19958

RE: Fringer v. Kersey Homes, Inc. C.A. No. 9780-VCG

Dear Counsel:

I have Plaintiff’s Motion for Reargument or in the alternative Motion to Amend Memorandum Opinion dated July 2, 2018. No response by Defendants is necessary. Proper grounds for granting a motion for reargument are that the Court, in its decision, has made an error of law or a misapprehension of fact, fundamental to its opinion. Upon review of the Motion, I find that it is without merit and is therefore denied.

The parties should attempt to agree to the appropriate method of administration of a remedy in this case. I will convene an office conference within two weeks concerning the appropriate remedy. To the extent that the foregoing requires an order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Vice Chancellor cc: Register in Chancery