Susan E. Harriman v. Mildred v. Ehrenberg and Julio Palmaz, M.D.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2019
Docket05-18-00800-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Susan E. Harriman v. Mildred v. Ehrenberg and Julio Palmaz, M.D. (Susan E. Harriman v. Mildred v. Ehrenberg and Julio Palmaz, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Susan E. Harriman v. Mildred v. Ehrenberg and Julio Palmaz, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 5, 2019

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00800-CV

SUSAN E. HARRIMAN, Appellant

V.

STEVEN SOLOMON AND JULIO PALMAZ, M.D., Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11994

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is appellant’s December 17, 2018 motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant

explains the parties have settled and the trial court signed an order of nonsuit with prejudice on

November 27, 2018. Appellant asks the Court to take notice of the parties’ settlement and order of

nonsuit with prejudice, vacate the trial court’s temporary injunction order of July 3, 2018, and

dismiss the appeal. Appellees filed a response to appellant’s motion. In their response, appellees

contend the trial court’s order of nonsuit renders this appeal moot. For this reason, they contend

the appropriate action for this Court is to dismiss the appeal as moot. When a trial court grants a nonsuit after signing a temporary injunction, the temporary

injunction ceases to exist, and the appeal becomes moot. See Gen. Land Office v. Oxy U.S.A., Inc.,

789 S.W.2d 569, 571 (Tex. 1990). Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion to the extent that we

dismiss the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).

/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

180800F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SUSAN E. HARRIMAN, Appellant On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-18-00800-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11994. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. STEVEN SOLOMON AND JULIO Justices Brown and Whitehill participating. PALMAZ, M.D., Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellees Steven Solomon and Julio Palmaz, M.D., recover their costs of this appeal from appellant Susan E. Harriman.

Judgment entered February 5, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEX. v. Oxy USA, Inc.
789 S.W.2d 569 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Susan E. Harriman v. Mildred v. Ehrenberg and Julio Palmaz, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susan-e-harriman-v-mildred-v-ehrenberg-and-julio-palmaz-md-texapp-2019.