Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc.

DecidedJune 12, 2009

Docket03-08-00474-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc. (Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00474-CV

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Entertainment Publications, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08-002240, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

I concur in the judgment and reasoning of the majority opinion, with the exception of the discussion of the four-part test for defining an "interpretive rule," found in footnote six. In light of our determination that the Comptroller's statements in the March and April 2008 letters constitute a rule under section 2001.003(6) of the APA, we need not address the issue of whether they might also be considered interpretive rules under the four-part test suggested by Professor Beal, or the impact, if any, of an "interpretive rule" designation under the test. Because this test has never been adopted by this Court or the Texas Supreme Court and is not necessary for disposition of the appeal, I decline to join footnote six of the majority opinion.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: June 12, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00474-CV

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Entertainment Publications, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08-002240, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

I concur in the judgment and reasoning of the majority opinion, with the exception of the discussion of the four-part test for defining an "interpretive rule," found in footnote six. In light of our determination that the Comptroller's statements in the March and April 2008 letters constitute a rule under section 2001.003(6) of the APA, we need not address the issue of whether they might also be considered interpretive rules under the four-part test suggested by Professor Beal, or the impact, if any, of an "interpretive rule" designation under the test. Because this test has never been adopted by this Court or the Texas Supreme Court and is not necessary for disposition of the appeal, I decline to join footnote six of the majority opinion.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: June 12, 2009

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susan-combs-comptroller-of-public-accounts-of-the--texapp-2009.