Susan Brooks v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 16, 2005
Docket04-04-00781-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Susan Brooks v. State (Susan Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Susan Brooks v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-04-00781-CR


Susan BROOKS,

Appellant


v.


The STATE of Texas,

Appellee


From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-CR-0765

Honorable Mary Román, Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   February 16, 2005


DISMISSED

            The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

            Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). On December 29, 2004, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by January 28, 2005. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No response was filed. In the absence of an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Susan Brooks v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susan-brooks-v-state-texapp-2005.