Susan Bisio v. the City of the Village of Clarkston

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2020·No. 158240·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 30, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

158240 (87)(90) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

SUSAN BISIO, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,

v SC: 158240 Justices COA: 335422 Oakland CC: 2015-150462-CZ THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF CLARKSTON, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a reply is GRANTED, and the brief filed with the motion is accepted for filing. The motion for review of taxation of costs is considered, and it is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2020

t0921 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Susan Bisio v. the City of the Village of Clarkston, (Mich. 2020).

Susan Bisio v. the City of the Village of Clarkston (Susan Bisio v. the City of the Village of Clarkston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.