Susan B. v. Charles M.

67 A.D.3d 488, 889 N.Y.S.2d 143
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Diane Kiesel, J.), entered on or about April 24, 2008, which granted the mother’s petition to modify a prior order governing respondent father’s visitation of their child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The original order directed respondent not to consume alcohol while with the child. We defer to the more recent determination of the nisi prius court (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173 [1982]), which was supported by the testimony of two police officers that respondent arrived at the designated location for exchange of the child in a state of intoxication. Such conduct constituted a change in circumstances warranting modification, [489]*489in the child’s best interests, to a more restrictive visitation schedule (see Matter of Kelley v VanDee, 61 AD3d 1281 [2009]). Concur—Gonzalez, EJ., Andrias, Saxe, Renwick and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Susan B. v. Charles M., 67 A.D.3d 488, 889 N.Y.S.2d 143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

67 A.D.3d 488 (Susan B. v. Charles M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Smith v. Loyster
2017 NY Slip Op 9092 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)