Surrey v. Piggot

Circuit Court of North Carolina

Surrey v. Piggot

1 N.C. 153

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 1, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 153 (Surrey v. Piggot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Surrey v. Piggot, 1 N.C. 153 (circtnc 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

Doderidge, J.

A way shall be extinct. But distinguendum est, whether it is a way of ease. If it is, it shall be extinct; but otherwise if it is of necessity. A fence shall be extinct, for it is not of necessity; because in the beginning there were no fences, 11 H. 7. 25. 4 Rep. Terringham’s case, 22 E. 1, Br. Extinguishment. 11 Dyer 295. Jones . 145. 3 Bulstr. 339. Noy 84. Peph. 166. Bendl. 188. I Roll. 936. Palm. 444. Hut. 110. Vin. 90. Vin. Entr. 355.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doderidge, J.

A way shall be extinct. But distinguendum est, whether it is a way of ease. If it is, it shall be extinct; but otherwise if it is of necessity. A fence shall be extinct, for it is not of necessity; because in the beginning there were no fences, 11 H. 7. 25. 4 Rep. Terringham’s case, 22 E. 1, Br. Extinguishment. 11 Dyer 295. Jones . 145. 3 Bulstr. 339. Noy 84. Peph. 166. Bendl. 188. I Roll. 936. Palm. 444. Hut. 110. Vin. 90. Vin. Entr. 355.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surrey-v-piggot-circtnc-1793.