Surrey v. Piggot

Circuit Court of North Carolina

Surrey v. Piggot

1 N.C. 153

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina·Decided July 1, 1793·Published

Opinion

Doderidge, J.

A way shall be extinct. But distinguendum est, whether it is a way of ease. If it is, it shall be extinct; but otherwise if it is of necessity. A fence shall be extinct, for it is not of necessity; because in the beginning there were no fences, 11 H. 7. 25. 4 Rep. Terringham’s case, 22 E. 1, Br. Extinguishment. 11 Dyer 295. Jones . 145. 3 Bulstr. 339. Noy 84. Peph. 166. Bendl. 188. I Roll. 936. Palm. 444. Hut. 110. Vin. 90. Vin. Entr. 355.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doderidge, J.

A way shall be extinct. But distinguendum est, whether it is a way of ease. If it is, it shall be extinct; but otherwise if it is of necessity. A fence shall be extinct, for it is not of necessity; because in the beginning there were no fences, 11 H. 7. 25. 4 Rep. Terringham’s case, 22 E. 1, Br. Extinguishment. 11 Dyer 295. Jones . 145. 3 Bulstr. 339. Noy 84. Peph. 166. Bendl. 188. I Roll. 936. Palm. 444. Hut. 110. Vin. 90. Vin. Entr. 355.

Surrey v. Piggot, 1 N.C. 153 (circtnc 1793).

Pincite

1 N.C. 153 (Surrey v. Piggot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.