Surrett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:24-cv-111-MOC-WCM CODY SURRETT o/b/o JENNIFER ) RAYFIELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) MARTIN O’MALLEY, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _____)
Defendant has moved this Court, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment reversing the decision in this case with a remand of the case for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 5). Plaintiffs attorney does not oppose Defendant’s motion for remand. The motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
Signed: October 18, 2024
p-crvrnne< Max O. Cogburn ifs 2) United States District Judge Tote t
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Surrett v. Commissioner of Social Security (Surrett v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.