Surowitz v. Turturro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Surowitz v. Turturro

7 A.D.2d 999, 184 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9818

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 999 (Surowitz v. Turturro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Surowitz v. Turturro, 7 A.D.2d 999, 184 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order substituting attorneys as fixed the fee of appellant, the retiring [1000]*1000attorney, on a quantum meruit basis at $200 inclusive of disbursements. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order substituting attorneys as fixed the fee of appellant, the retiring [1000]*1000attorney, on a quantum meruit basis at $200 inclusive of disbursements. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 999, 184 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surowitz-v-turturro-nyappdiv-1959.