Surles v. Dane & Murphy, Inc.
This text of 189 A.D.2d 761 (Surles v. Dane & Murphy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, negligence, and breach of contract, the defendant Allied Van Lines, Inc. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.), dated September 12, 1990, which denied its motion [762]*762for a stay of the action based upon the bankruptcy of the codefendant Dane & Murphy, Inc. and granted the cross motion by the plaintiff to sever Dane & Murphy, Inc. from the action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs (see, Rosenbaum v Dane & Murphy, 189 AD2d 760 [decided herewith]). Lawrence, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 A.D.2d 761, 592 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/surles-v-dane-murphy-inc-nyappdiv-1993.