Surles v. Dane & Murphy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Surles v. Dane & Murphy, Inc.

189 A.D.2d 761, 592 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 210

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 11, 1993·Published

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, negligence, and breach of contract, the defendant Allied Van Lines, Inc. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.), dated September 12, 1990, which denied its motion [762] for a stay of the action based upon the bankruptcy of the codefendant Dane & Murphy, Inc. and granted the cross motion by the plaintiff to sever Dane & Murphy, Inc. from the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs (see, Rosenbaum v Dane & Murphy, 189 AD2d 760 [decided herewith]). Lawrence, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, negligence, and breach of contract, the defendant Allied Van Lines, Inc. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.), dated September 12, 1990, which denied its motion [762] for a stay of the action based upon the bankruptcy of the codefendant Dane & Murphy, Inc. and granted the cross motion by the plaintiff to sever Dane & Murphy, Inc. from the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs (see, Rosenbaum v Dane & Murphy, 189 AD2d 760 [decided herewith]). Lawrence, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Surles v. Dane & Murphy, Inc., 189 A.D.2d 761, 592 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

189 A.D.2d 761 (Surles v. Dane & Murphy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related